Cancer protection that medicine does not speak of

There are sometimes discoveries that are far ahead of their time. This applies, for example, to the extensive work of Professor Dr. E. Küster, who was head of the Hygiene Institute of the University of Frankfurt before and during the Second World War. Together with Dr. Karl Dittmar from the Department of Cancer Research at the State Institute for Experimental Therapy, he spent years working on means of treating tumors.

Already in those years, air ionization was used for many therapeutic treatments and the two researchers wondered whether a connection with cancer proliferation might not also be possible via the electrical cell property. These studies were published on June 23, 1940, but went unnoticed due to the World War.

During the research carried out by our research team in Switzerland, we conducted extensive literature studies and came across these publications in the mid-1960s. Subsequently, the work of Küster and Dittmar has been re-examined. It is to be noted that their statements - even according to the current criteria of research - still have a high probability of their own and may be considered unique.

Most cancer research institutes are mainly concerned with cell change in the biochemical sense. We have spoken to many such researchers and found that, since Warburg, it is now generally agreed that oxygen growth takes place in the healthy cell, while the cancer cell is in a fermentation stage, i.e. growing by carbonic acid respiration and destruction of its own substance. The yeast works in the same way.

As has already been reported, a healthy oxygen-breathing cell has a negative potential by about 70 millivolts, whereas a cancerous cell has a very low negative or almost positive cell membrane potential!

From their field of work Küster and Dittmar report on secured therapeutic successes in the treatment of tumors with negative highly ionized air. In mice and rats, ionization had a significant influence on the growth of vaccine tumors and on the lifespan of the tumor carriers.

Spontaneous tumors proved to be influenceable. The prophylactic effect of ionization was particularly pronounced in the development of sarcomas of the subcutaneous connective tissue caused by benzyprene. Benzyprene, which is considered to be particularly carcinogenic, is frequently used in experiments. It is known that this benzyprene is also present in cigarette smoke in not inconsiderable quantities and is suspected to be one of the causes of smoker's cancer.

In a series of experiments, the group of scientists worked with various tumors and sarcomas and came to the same scientifically substantiated result time and again. They came to the conclusion that the disappearance of the tumors could only be a consequence of ionization, because they had never observed anything similarly astonishing in all their previous experiments. The regression of, for example, a Jensen sarcoma the size of a hazelnut sometimes occurs, but once it exceeds this size, it continues to grow.

With the help of air ionization, however, it was possible in nine isolated animals that had tumors the size of a pigeon's egg to completely regress within a short time from the thirtieth day after cancer vaccination. They also found that even in the case of spontaneous tumors, ionization can cause the tumors to regress if they are not too large, as they observed in cases of breast cancer. Otherwise, the effect of ionization can be recognized by slower tumor growth, or a stop in growth. The life-prolonging effect was clearly shown in the ionized animals (compared to the control animals) sixty days after the beginning of the ionization: half of the treated animals were still alive, while in the same period all control animals had died from their tumors.

In their summary Professor Küster and Dr. Dittmar stated: "The influence of ionized air on mice and rats with vaccination and spontaneous tumors was examined. A considerable extension of their lifetime was achieved in animals with vaccination tumors as well as in those with spontaneous tumors and with carcinomatous ascites (abdominal dropsy) compared to non-treated control animals. Tumor growth was inhibited and the initial rate of tumor growth was reduced after vaccination. In some animals, larger tumors were also made to disappear.

The prophylactic effect of ionization was particularly strong, because in numerous mice the appearance of sarcomas after injection of benzyprene was prevented by ionization. Therapeutically, ionization could be considered for postoperative treatment of cancer to prevent recurrence (relapse) and as a supportive treatment after radiation therapy. Also prophylactically, to prevent cancer, ionization could gain importance.

As already mentioned, these works and their significant results have been forgotten and lost due to the chaos of war. It is also possible that they were so unique that they could not find their way into cancer research, which is mainly rooted in the biochemical mechanism.

It is primarily the ionization at the cell surface, i.e. the electrical voltage increase in the negative potential range, which causes the normalization of the cell. The irradiation itself results in a combustion of the cell due to the high radiation power.

When will cancer research, which is so important for mankind, begin to take into account all aspects, however new and at the moment (1971) hardly fitting into its concept?

By a regular application of the BIONIC© Ionizer Tachyon Generator you can ...